2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* NSA Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) security module
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This file contains the SELinux XFRM hook function implementations.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Authors: Serge Hallyn <sergeh@us.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
* Trent Jaeger <jaegert@us.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Updated: Venkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com>
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Granular IPSec Associations for use in MLS environments.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2005 International Business Machines Corporation
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2006 Trusted Computer Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2,
|
|
|
|
* as published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* USAGE:
|
|
|
|
* NOTES:
|
|
|
|
* 1. Make sure to enable the following options in your kernel config:
|
|
|
|
* CONFIG_SECURITY=y
|
|
|
|
* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK=y
|
|
|
|
* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM=y
|
|
|
|
* CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX=m/y
|
|
|
|
* ISSUES:
|
|
|
|
* 1. Caching packets, so they are not dropped during negotiation
|
|
|
|
* 2. Emulating a reasonable SO_PEERSEC across machines
|
|
|
|
* 3. Testing addition of sk_policy's with security context via setsockopt
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/init.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/security.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/types.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/netfilter.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/netfilter_ipv4.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/netfilter_ipv6.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/slab.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/ip.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/tcp.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/xfrm.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <net/xfrm.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <net/checksum.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <net/udp.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/atomic.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "avc.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "objsec.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "xfrm.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Labeled XFRM instance counter */
|
|
|
|
atomic_t selinux_xfrm_refcount = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns true if the context is an LSM/SELinux context.
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static inline int selinux_authorizable_ctx(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return (ctx &&
|
|
|
|
(ctx->ctx_doi == XFRM_SC_DOI_LSM) &&
|
|
|
|
(ctx->ctx_alg == XFRM_SC_ALG_SELINUX));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns true if the xfrm contains a security blob for SELinux.
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static inline int selinux_authorizable_xfrm(struct xfrm_state *x)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return selinux_authorizable_ctx(x->security);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
* Allocates a xfrm_sec_state and populates it using the supplied security
|
|
|
|
* xfrm_user_sec_ctx context.
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
static int selinux_xfrm_alloc_user(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp,
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx,
|
|
|
|
gfp_t gfp)
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int rc;
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
const struct task_security_struct *tsec = current_security();
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = NULL;
|
|
|
|
u32 str_len;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (ctxp == NULL || uctx == NULL ||
|
|
|
|
uctx->ctx_doi != XFRM_SC_DOI_LSM ||
|
|
|
|
uctx->ctx_alg != XFRM_SC_ALG_SELINUX)
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
str_len = uctx->ctx_len;
|
|
|
|
if (str_len >= PAGE_SIZE)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*ctx) + str_len + 1, gfp);
|
|
|
|
if (!ctx)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ctx->ctx_doi = XFRM_SC_DOI_LSM;
|
|
|
|
ctx->ctx_alg = XFRM_SC_ALG_SELINUX;
|
|
|
|
ctx->ctx_len = str_len;
|
|
|
|
memcpy(ctx->ctx_str, &uctx[1], str_len);
|
|
|
|
ctx->ctx_str[str_len] = '\0';
|
|
|
|
rc = security_context_to_sid(ctx->ctx_str, str_len, &ctx->ctx_sid, gfp);
|
|
|
|
if (rc)
|
|
|
|
goto err;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
rc = avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
|
|
|
|
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SETCONTEXT, NULL);
|
|
|
|
if (rc)
|
|
|
|
goto err;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
*ctxp = ctx;
|
|
|
|
atomic_inc(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
err:
|
|
|
|
kfree(ctx);
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
return rc;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Free the xfrm_sec_ctx structure.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void selinux_xfrm_free(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (!ctx)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
atomic_dec(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
|
|
|
|
kfree(ctx);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Authorize the deletion of a labeled SA or policy rule.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int selinux_xfrm_delete(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const struct task_security_struct *tsec = current_security();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!ctx)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
|
|
|
|
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SETCONTEXT,
|
|
|
|
NULL);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* LSM hook implementation that authorizes that a flow can use a xfrm policy
|
|
|
|
* rule.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx, u32 fl_secid, u8 dir)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int rc;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* All flows should be treated as polmatch'ing an otherwise applicable
|
|
|
|
* "non-labeled" policy. This would prevent inadvertent "leaks". */
|
|
|
|
if (!ctx)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Context sid is either set to label or ANY_ASSOC */
|
|
|
|
if (!selinux_authorizable_ctx(ctx))
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rc = avc_has_perm(fl_secid, ctx->ctx_sid,
|
|
|
|
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__POLMATCH, NULL);
|
|
|
|
return (rc == -EACCES ? -ESRCH : rc);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* LSM hook implementation that authorizes that a state matches
|
|
|
|
* the given policy, flow combo.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
int selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x,
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_policy *xp,
|
|
|
|
const struct flowi *fl)
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 state_sid;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!xp->security)
|
|
|
|
if (x->security)
|
|
|
|
/* unlabeled policy and labeled SA can't match */
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
/* unlabeled policy and unlabeled SA match all flows */
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
if (!x->security)
|
|
|
|
/* unlabeled SA and labeled policy can't match */
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
if (!selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x))
|
|
|
|
/* Not a SELinux-labeled SA */
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
state_sid = x->security->ctx_sid;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fl->flowi_secid != state_sid)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
/* We don't need a separate SA Vs. policy polmatch check since the SA
|
|
|
|
* is now of the same label as the flow and a flow Vs. policy polmatch
|
|
|
|
* check had already happened in selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup() above. */
|
|
|
|
return (avc_has_perm(fl->flowi_secid, state_sid,
|
|
|
|
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SENDTO,
|
|
|
|
NULL) ? 0 : 1);
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
static u32 selinux_xfrm_skb_sid_egress(struct sk_buff *skb)
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
struct dst_entry *dst = skb_dst(skb);
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_state *x;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (dst == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return SECSID_NULL;
|
|
|
|
x = dst->xfrm;
|
|
|
|
if (x == NULL || !selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x))
|
|
|
|
return SECSID_NULL;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
return x->security->ctx_sid;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int selinux_xfrm_skb_sid_ingress(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
|
|
|
u32 *sid, int ckall)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 sid_session = SECSID_NULL;
|
|
|
|
struct sec_path *sp = skb->sp;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (sp) {
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
for (i = sp->len - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
struct xfrm_state *x = sp->xvec[i];
|
|
|
|
if (selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x)) {
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = x->security;
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (sid_session == SECSID_NULL) {
|
|
|
|
sid_session = ctx->ctx_sid;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!ckall)
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
} else if (sid_session != ctx->ctx_sid) {
|
|
|
|
*sid = SECSID_NULL;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
*sid = sid_session;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
* LSM hook implementation that checks and/or returns the xfrm sid for the
|
|
|
|
* incoming packet.
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
int selinux_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid, int ckall)
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (skb == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
*sid = SECSID_NULL;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
return selinux_xfrm_skb_sid_ingress(skb, sid, ckall);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
int selinux_xfrm_skb_sid(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int rc;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
rc = selinux_xfrm_skb_sid_ingress(skb, sid, 0);
|
|
|
|
if (rc == 0 && *sid == SECSID_NULL)
|
|
|
|
*sid = selinux_xfrm_skb_sid_egress(skb);
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return rc;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
* LSM hook implementation that allocs and transfers uctx spec to xfrm_policy.
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int selinux_xfrm_policy_alloc(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp,
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx,
|
|
|
|
gfp_t gfp)
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
return selinux_xfrm_alloc_user(ctxp, uctx, gfp);
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
* LSM hook implementation that copies security data structure from old to new
|
|
|
|
* for policy cloning.
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int selinux_xfrm_policy_clone(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *old_ctx,
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_sec_ctx **new_ctxp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_sec_ctx *new_ctx;
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!old_ctx)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new_ctx = kmemdup(old_ctx, sizeof(*old_ctx) + old_ctx->ctx_len,
|
|
|
|
GFP_ATOMIC);
|
|
|
|
if (!new_ctx)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
atomic_inc(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
|
|
|
|
*new_ctxp = new_ctx;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* LSM hook implementation that frees xfrm_sec_ctx security information.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void selinux_xfrm_policy_free(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
selinux_xfrm_free(ctx);
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* LSM hook implementation that authorizes deletion of labeled policies.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int selinux_xfrm_policy_delete(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
return selinux_xfrm_delete(ctx);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* LSM hook implementation that allocates a xfrm_sec_state, populates it using
|
|
|
|
* the supplied security context, and assigns it to the xfrm_state.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int selinux_xfrm_state_alloc(struct xfrm_state *x,
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return selinux_xfrm_alloc_user(&x->security, uctx, GFP_KERNEL);
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
* LSM hook implementation that allocates a xfrm_sec_state and populates based
|
|
|
|
* on a secid.
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
int selinux_xfrm_state_alloc_acquire(struct xfrm_state *x,
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_sec_ctx *polsec, u32 secid)
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
int rc;
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx;
|
|
|
|
char *ctx_str = NULL;
|
|
|
|
int str_len;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!polsec)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (secid == 0)
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rc = security_sid_to_context(secid, &ctx_str, &str_len);
|
|
|
|
if (rc)
|
|
|
|
return rc;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*ctx) + str_len, GFP_ATOMIC);
|
|
|
|
if (!ctx) {
|
|
|
|
rc = -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ctx->ctx_doi = XFRM_SC_DOI_LSM;
|
|
|
|
ctx->ctx_alg = XFRM_SC_ALG_SELINUX;
|
|
|
|
ctx->ctx_sid = secid;
|
|
|
|
ctx->ctx_len = str_len;
|
|
|
|
memcpy(ctx->ctx_str, ctx_str, str_len);
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
x->security = ctx;
|
|
|
|
atomic_inc(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
|
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
kfree(ctx_str);
|
|
|
|
return rc;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* LSM hook implementation that frees xfrm_state security information.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void selinux_xfrm_state_free(struct xfrm_state *x)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
selinux_xfrm_free(x->security);
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* LSM hook implementation that authorizes deletion of labeled SAs.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
int selinux_xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
return selinux_xfrm_delete(x->security);
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* LSM hook that controls access to unlabelled packets. If
|
|
|
|
* a xfrm_state is authorizable (defined by macro) then it was
|
|
|
|
* already authorized by the IPSec process. If not, then
|
|
|
|
* we need to check for unlabelled access since this may not have
|
|
|
|
* gone thru the IPSec process.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
|
|
|
struct common_audit_data *ad)
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct sec_path *sp = skb->sp;
|
|
|
|
u32 peer_sid = SECINITSID_UNLABELED;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (sp) {
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < sp->len; i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_state *x = sp->xvec[i];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (x && selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x)) {
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = x->security;
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
peer_sid = ctx->ctx_sid;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
/* This check even when there's no association involved is intended,
|
|
|
|
* according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a process can't engage in
|
|
|
|
* non-IPsec communication unless explicitly allowed by policy. */
|
|
|
|
return avc_has_perm(sk_sid, peer_sid,
|
|
|
|
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__RECVFROM, ad);
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* POSTROUTE_LAST hook's XFRM processing:
|
|
|
|
* If we have no security association, then we need to determine
|
|
|
|
* whether the socket is allowed to send to an unlabelled destination.
|
|
|
|
* If we do have a authorizable security association, then it has already been
|
|
|
|
* checked in the selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match hook above.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
|
|
|
struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto)
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct dst_entry *dst;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (proto) {
|
|
|
|
case IPPROTO_AH:
|
|
|
|
case IPPROTO_ESP:
|
|
|
|
case IPPROTO_COMP:
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
/* We should have already seen this packet once before it
|
|
|
|
* underwent xfrm(s). No need to subject it to the unlabeled
|
|
|
|
* check. */
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
dst = skb_dst(skb);
|
|
|
|
if (dst) {
|
|
|
|
struct dst_entry *iter;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (iter = dst; iter != NULL; iter = iter->child) {
|
|
|
|
struct xfrm_state *x = iter->xfrm;
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-09-09 08:57:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (x && selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x))
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* This check even when there's no association involved is intended,
|
|
|
|
* according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a process can't engage in
|
|
|
|
* non-IPsec communication unless explicitly allowed by policy. */
|
|
|
|
return avc_has_perm(sk_sid, SECINITSID_UNLABELED,
|
|
|
|
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SENDTO, ad);
|
2024-09-09 08:52:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|